Post by account_disabled on Dec 7, 2023 6:42:43 GMT
One problem that is difficult to spot and solve is avoiding discussion of observed shortcomings in the Scrum Team’s work. This can lead to much more serious problems in the long run. The Scrum C Level Executive List Master’s task, therefore, is to keep a close eye on the situation in the team and encourage all team members to be proactive from the very beginning of the Sprint Retrospective.
Focus on one-time problems or successes Another problem that can arise during Sprint Retrospective is paying insufficient attention to cyclical and repetitive team behaviors, and their impact on team effectiveness. It’s always good to congratulate Scrum Team members if they have achieved exceptional success. However, Sprint Review should not be dedicated to celebrating it. The same is true of failures. If something failed due to fortuitous reasons or an already diagnosed error, it is not worth over-analyzing the event during Sprint Review. Sometimes, however, the team devotes a large part of the Sprint Retrospective to such events.
Keep in mind though, that the purpose of Sprint Retrospective is to look for ways to improve the team’s daily work. Therefore, the meeting should not revolve around one-time successes or problems that are highly likely not to happen again. Over-representation of Product Owner In many organizations, the position of Product Owner is equated with that of Product Manager. Product Owner is then often considered the supervisor of the Scrum Team.